Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution

From: Robin Faichney (robin@reborntechnology.co.uk)
Date: Fri Feb 09 2001 - 09:18:19 GMT

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: Labels for memes"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id JAA28895 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 9 Feb 2001 09:21:50 GMT
    Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 09:18:19 +0000
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution
    Message-ID: <20010209091819.C1178@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    References: <20010208201954.AAA9140%camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]> <3A8328F4.73C83319@pacbell.net>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Disposition: inline
    User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i
    In-Reply-To: <3A8328F4.73C83319@pacbell.net>; from bspight@pacbell.net on Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 03:17:08PM -0800
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 03:17:08PM -0800, Bill Spight wrote:
    > Dear Wade,
    >
    > > The mechanism itself, the lamarckian mechanism, has been shown, I would
    > > think with certitude, not to exist in nature at all. It is a skyhook, to
    > > borrow Dennett's term. It is an invented quality rising from the
    > > perceptual traps we fall into when we see patterns.
    > >
    >
    > That is because, with genes, the germ line is insulated from the
    > environment. It is the phenotype that adapts and learns from the
    > environment. These adaptations are not transferred to the genotype.
    > (There are apparently some exceptions, however.)
    >
    > But there is no germ line with memes. "Play it, Sam, for old times'
    > sake," is altered by the environment to "Play it again, Sam," and the
    > alteration is passed on. That's Lamarckian evolution.

    Your logic works either way. If there is no germ line, no memeotype/
    phemotype dichotomy, then is no way to distinguish between Lamarckism and
    ordinary mutation. In which case, for the sake of simplicity (Ockham's
    razor), we should consider it ordinary mutation.

    -- 
    Robin Faichney
    robin@reborntechnology.co.uk
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 09 2001 - 09:23:59 GMT