Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id VAA02500 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 9 Feb 2001 21:16:44 GMT Message-ID: <005b01c092e2$653c78e0$9306bed4@default> From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be> To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> References: <20010208201954.AAA9140%camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]> <3A8328F4.73C83319@pacbell.net> <20010209091819.C1178@reborntechnology.co.uk> Subject: Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 22:50:26 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Hi Robin,
You wrote,
> > But there is no germ line with memes.
<< I would not say that, though !! LdB coined the first steps of such
possibility.
And if we ever can prove that memes pass the genes germline, we can
IMO find what I see as our memetic starterset is in fact the germ line
with memes.
IMO, again, acquired neurological adaptive patterns can be germline
integrated.
Best,
Kenneth
( I am, because we are) still
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 09 2001 - 21:20:28 GMT