Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id QAA00888 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 21 Jul 2000 16:48:42 +0100 Message-ID: <001201bff32e$fd6d30e0$4c05bed4@default> From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be> To: "memetics" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Subject: Gender Bias For Memes Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 18:14:47 +0200 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000C_01BFF33F.8D7668E0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Vincent,
Take a look at this
Male Female
Sameness Difference
order change
single context ' fuzz the bounderies '
schizophrenia depression
suicide (guns) suicide attempt (poison)
action language
instinct raison
consensus opportunism
general special
dasein mitzein
Darwin ? Lamarck ?
(objects) (waves) relationships
genetc ? memetic ?
la nature naturelle ? la nature artificiel ?
from out these very general discriptions we can easily assume that the male/
female distinction has a solid bias to continu on !!
Although both categories are as well male as female oriented we can suppose
that on the ' original ' genetic/ memetic bias the discriptions are more male/
more female processed and so the memes which evolved from this would too !?
What do you think !?
With thanks to Chris Lofting, I used some ideas...
regards,
Kenneth
(I am, because we are)
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 21 2000 - 16:49:34 BST