RE: Gender Bias For Memes

From: Chris Lofting (ddiamond@ozemail.com.au)
Date: Sat Jul 22 2000 - 01:33:55 BST

  • Next message: Chris Lofting: "RE: Was Freud a Minivan or S.U.V. Kind of Guy? Israel and Palesti ne."

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id BAA01751 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 22 Jul 2000 01:18:14 +0100
    From: "Chris Lofting" <ddiamond@ozemail.com.au>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Gender Bias For Memes
    Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2000 10:33:55 +1000
    Message-ID: <LPBBICPHCJJBPJGHGMCIEEIACHAA.ddiamond@ozemail.com.au>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
    Importance: Normal
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    In-Reply-To: <001201bff32e$fd6d30e0$4c05bed4@default>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Hi Kenneth,

    yes, these distinctions are covered at the websites but in a context of left
    brain/right brain and so you need to be wary. For example you use the
    action/language distinction. I understand what you mean but I think you may
    need to expand on it. There is the 'man of few words' cliche that goes along
    with this...as well as the concept of a 'chatter-box' often used describing
    females...

    Not sure about consensus as male and opportunism as female. Consensus means
    an agreement and that is more female in that it is a term found in the space
    in-between objects; relational space - more female. Aha -- yes of course,
    the PROCESS of consensus making is female but once established so it becomes
    an object and so male. Thus the term consensus has a development process
    that follows the bind-bound-bond-blend where the initial phase is different
    parties 'circling' each other, spiraling through spacetime. They contract
    and move from a relational emphasis to becoming/establishing a whole in the
    form of an agreed-upon term/phrase/ruling etc.

    You have male linked to opportunism .. umm..yea..ok... if left to their own
    devices the idea is not to get consensus as to get consensus to THEIR point
    of view! Thus any perceived weakness in the other party is jumped-upon;
    there is still present the drive to be number one. The female emphasis is
    more on transformation, birth, where neither party 'wins' in that they all
    'win'.

    And 'general' as male? umm...maybe I am misinterpreting this but since the
    emphasis in males is more overall on objects emphasis so there is a
    favouring the particular and the local so:

    MALE --- FEMALE

    Local --- NON-local
    Particular --- General

    We CAN mix these distinctions due to the use of the method of recursive
    dichotomisations (and you do mention this), but in general (!) we do see
    these gender differences. (but see later comments re education etc.)

    Perhaps in general/special you mean casual vs dressed-up? As in males wear
    the same jeans, sneakers, underwear (black suits) for months and the females
    dress differently everyday? :-)

    I find the suicide perspective is interesting in that the male blows their
    brains apart (very explicit, in your face) and the female takes a tablet and
    'dissapears' (very implicit, quiet).

    Reason as 'female'. Ok, in that it tries to get BEHIND things. In the
    template the rationists are symbolised as 'female' in 'male', thus they try
    to describe differences in the context/format of 'one' (sameness). Thus the
    favouring of algorithms and formulas.

    The instinct of the male is in the form of stimulus/response, no feedback in
    that any type of a stimulus, regardless of degree, is met with the SAME
    response, there is no recognition of DIFFERENCE. The female has this as well
    but is also more discerning, she will look 'past' or 'behind' the stimulus.
    determine the degree and so response is more discerning.

    In teaching/training the idea is to (a) take the GENERAL stimulus/response
    (S/R) and (b) REFINE it. Thus we move from general S/R to particular S/Rs
    within the general. This teaching of discernment aids in giving us choice to
    such a degree where it all becomes habit and we 'return' to S/R but now with
    more choices. Martial Arts etc does this; by learning the Science of your
    Art (and visa versa) so you have more choices in expression.

    The male IS more single context and so more biased to 'react' without
    thought of consequence; the male is more 'totalist', fundamentalist whereas
    the female is more relativist, more context aware (and so more discerning).

    The goal of education is to 'refine' our gene-derived skills and our present
    system allows for the de-gendering of some of these seemingly
    gender-specific skills.

    Overall I have no problems with the list. you seem to have gotten the idea
    re left/right, sameness/difference etc.

    Best,

    Chris.
    ------------------
    Chris Lofting
    websites:
    http://www.eisa.net.au/~lofting
    http://www.ozemail.com.au/~ddiamond

    -----Original Message-----
    From: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk [mailto:fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk]On Behalf Of
    Kenneth Van Oost
    Sent: Saturday, 22 July 2000 2:15
    To: memetics
    Subject: Gender Bias For Memes

    Vincent,

    Take a look at this

    Male Female

    Sameness Difference
    order change
    single context ' fuzz the bounderies '
    schizophrenia depression
    suicide (guns) suicide attempt (poison)
    action language
    instinct raison
    consensus opportunism
    general special
    dasein mitzein
    Darwin ? Lamarck ?
         (objects) (waves) relationships
    genetc ? memetic ?
    la nature naturelle ? la nature artificiel ?

    from out these very general discriptions we can easily assume that the male/
    female distinction has a solid bias to continu on !!

    Although both categories are as well male as female oriented we can suppose
    that on the ' original ' genetic/ memetic bias the discriptions are more
    male/
    more female processed and so the memes which evolved from this would too !?

    What do you think !?

    With thanks to Chris Lofting, I used some ideas...

    regards,

    Kenneth

    (I am, because we are)

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 22 2000 - 01:19:10 BST