Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id PAA00716 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 21 Jul 2000 15:52:29 +0100 Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D310174594A@inchna.stir.ac.uk> From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk> To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Subject: RE: Was Freud a Minivan or S.U.V. Kind of Guy? Israel and Palesti ne. Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 15:50:39 +0100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Just one more comment, and then I'll let it lie.
I'm not a neuro-scientist, so I can't really comment on that aspect of your
claims, but I'd be incredibly surprised to find that neuroscience in any way
supports the notion that if we switch one I-ching symbol for another we can
explain or solve problems in the Middle-East.
If it were that simple, then why not offer your services to the Camp David
negotiations? They certainly seem to need some help, and I'm sure they'd
appreciate it.
If you feel that this system explains life the universe and everything for
you, then fine, I wish you well.
Vincent
(By the way, just a small bit of advice regarding your presentation of
arguments- putting words in capital letters doesn't make them more
persuasive).
> ----------
> From: Chris Lofting
> Reply To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 8:04 pm
> To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
> Subject: RE: Was Freud a Minivan or S.U.V. Kind of Guy? Israel and
> Palestine.
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk [mailto:fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk]On Behalf
> > Of Vincent Campbell
> > Sent: Friday, 21 July 2000 12:49
> > To: 'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'
> > Subject: RE: Was Freud a Minivan or S.U.V. Kind of Guy? Israel and
> > Palestine.
> >
> >
> > These are not fundamental categorisations, these are your idiolectic
> > categorisations, and merely supports the main point of my last post.
> >
>
> the distinctions of what/where, and the entanglement of these elements
> into
> more complex forms, is built-in to the neurology and that dictates the
> structure of all meaning that is possible 'in here'. Read the references I
> gave.
>
> The distinctions of what/where (as used in neuroscience texts) are
> synonymous with those of object/relationship and when these are flesh-out,
> by using recursion, into wholes, parts, static relationships and dynamic
> relationships you can map these distinctions to a set of basic feelings
> Blend (whole), Bound (parts), Bond (Static relationships) and Bind
> (dynamics).
>
> All of that comes straight out of analysis of the neurology and these
> FUNDAMENTAL, NEUROLOGICALLY determined, categorisations were there well
> before I was.
>
> You dont like it do you. :-) What is it? the sense of containment implied,
> the restraint? wouldnt worry about it, there is so much to experience that
> you could do without it, ignore it. Get on with what ever you are trying
> to
> do, let it pass. :-)
>
> Just note that I do use the method in analysis and it does seem to aid in
> my
> fleshing-out of ideas, concepts etc so if you find it difficult to read my
> emails then just ignore them, set up your browser to filter them out.
>
> Best,
>
> Chris.
> ------------------
> Chris Lofting
> websites:
> http://www.eisa.net.au/~lofting
> http://www.ozemail.com.au/~ddiamond
>
>
>
> ===============================================================
> This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
> Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
> For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
> see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
>
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 21 2000 - 15:53:20 BST