RE: Gender Bias For Memes

From: Bruce Jones (BruceJ@nwths.com)
Date: Tue Jul 25 2000 - 20:25:48 BST

  • Next message: Mark M. Mills: "RE: Simple neural models"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA05246 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 25 Jul 2000 20:20:21 +0100
    Message-ID: <B6E47FBD3879D31192AD009027AC929C368963@NWTH-EXCHANGE>
    From: Bruce  Jones <BruceJ@nwths.com>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Gender Bias For Memes
    Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 14:25:48 -0500
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9)
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Just starting to read some of this .....
    Very interesting premise going on....
    Males and Females DO NOT think alike and therefore do not interpret the
    same.
    This difference has been the brunt of jokes for a very long time.

    Personally I feel how a statement is interpreted falls along a lot more
    lines than gender.
    1) language being spoken
    2) Culture
    3) education
    4) experience
    5) gender
    In that order.

    The reason I pulled this out to re-post was not because of anything profound
    but to ask if the posting persona burned out a few brain cells looking for
    these tidbits of ...... whatever?

    Bruce Jones

    > When you use a plethoric avalanche of fuzzily quasidescriptive
    > verbiage from which the claim manages to surface that men as a
    > rule speak more precicely and concisely than do womem, you do
    > indeed violate your own propounded rule.
    > And the personality enneagram has nine stations; apply dualistic
    > thinking to THAT.
    > Those who have nothing in their favor indeed have nothing to lose, a
    > position that applies a forteriori to you AND your point of view. I
    > notice that your previous politeness dropped like a rock when your
    > fundamentalistic and reductionistic conception was credibly
    > challenged; I expected as much.
    > Trying to make logical sense out of your screeds is like trying to
    > push a stick of butter up a wildcat's nether regions with a red-hot
    > poker.
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 25 2000 - 20:21:16 BST