RE: Simple neural models

From: Mark M. Mills (mmills@htcomp.net)
Date: Tue Jul 25 2000 - 23:38:40 BST

  • Next message: Mark M. Mills: "Re: Memetics a pseudoscience?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id XAA05697 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 25 Jul 2000 23:41:04 +0100
    Message-Id: <4.3.1.0.20000725165641.00c30c70@pop3.htcomp.net>
    X-Sender: mmills@pop3.htcomp.net
    X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1
    Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 18:38:40 -0400
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    From: "Mark M. Mills" <mmills@htcomp.net>
    Subject: RE: Simple neural models
    In-Reply-To: <A4400389479FD3118C9400508B0FF230040E66@DELTA>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Derek,

    At 11:06 AM 7/25/00 +0200, you wrote:

    >Derek:
    >Yes, I can follow that. Either neurotransmitter is released or it isn't.
    >Fair enough.
    >
    >Mark:
    >there is an inherent
    >memory storage system involved. Knowing the 'charge state' at one moment,
    >implies knowing the previous state. Voila!, memetic memory.
    >
    >Derek:
    >Here you lose me. Why does the binary state of a nerve cell imply any
    >inherent memory, or memory of any kind?

    I'm not suggesting an entire nerve cell takes on a single binary state,
    only that binary elements at the synapse level play key roles in
    electro-chemical signal processing. Specifically, I'm alluding to
    Kock's description of autophosphorylating kinases (Biophysics of
    Computation). He suggested they are analogous to transistors. With a
    certain amount of voltage applied to them, they conduct. Without the
    voltage, they resist.

    As to memory, if an autophosphorylating kinases is conducting, then its
    previous state was non-conducting. They can only be one or the other. One
    might say that the cells doesn't know 'when' the previous state existed (1
    msec ago? 10 seconds ago?), but there is still a piece of inferential data
    available about the past which a signal processing system could use. Add a
    stable electrical wave pattern to the system and much more can be made of
    the inference.

    Since listening to neural signals crossing synapse membranes is very
    difficult, most work on the role phosphorylating kinases comes from
    observations of physiological change during embryonic neural
    developments. They play key roles in neural differentiation, cell
    migration and connectivity. Knock out a kinases and the brain doesn't
    develop properly. For example, knocking out the gene for mDab1 (tyrosine
    phosphorylated during embryonic development) in mice does nothing to change
    the mice for the first week after birth. After that, they exhibit
    increasing motor deficits and grossly malformed brains. Apparently, the
    neural cells differentiate, but fail to migrate.

    http://www.fhcrc.org/science/scientific_report/basic/jcooper.html

    Edelman in 'Neural Darwinism' suggests neural systems develop according to
    'neuronal group' selection. This provides a level of complexity left
    'undetermined' by the genetic foundation. By binding Edelman's ideas to
    Kock's, we get neuronal groups with binary signal processing at their
    foundations (neural memetics).

    The neural system is a self-determining organ, with its own developmental
    memory founded upon its own mechanisms. Koch describes 15 potential memory
    recording systems. The autophosphorylating kinases are simply the fastest
    at changing from 'conducting' to 'non-conducting.' Going back to the mouse
    example above, the observed lack of neural cell migration shows cellular
    differentiation occurred (genetics) but not the normal migration (neural
    memetics).

    While you might object that migration of neural cells to proper locations
    in the brain has little to do with cultural artifacts like Windsor knots,
    the ability to create Windsor knots reflect physiological changes in the
    brain of 'enabled' individuals, too. As an individual goes from 'blank' to
    'Windsor knot' enabled psychological states, their brain changes, neural
    cells extend themselves, connections are made. We are discussing a matter
    of degree, not of kind.

    Mark

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 25 2000 - 23:41:58 BST