RE: Simple neural models

From: Mark M. Mills (mmills@htcomp.net)
Date: Sun Aug 06 2000 - 00:43:57 BST

  • Next message: Scott Chase: "RE: Simple neural models"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id AAA08037 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 6 Aug 2000 00:35:41 +0100
    Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20000805174233.00b0aef0@pop3.htcomp.net>
    X-Sender: mmills@pop3.htcomp.net
    X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
    Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2000 18:43:57 -0500
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    From: "Mark M. Mills" <mmills@htcomp.net>
    Subject: RE: Simple neural models
    In-Reply-To: <4.3.1.0.20000725165641.00c30c70@pop3.htcomp.net>
    References: <A4400389479FD3118C9400508B0FF230040E66@DELTA>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    At 06:38 PM 7/25/00 -0400, I wrote:
    >I'm not suggesting an entire nerve cell takes on a single binary state,
    >only that binary elements at the synapse level play key roles in
    >electro-chemical signal processing. Specifically, I'm alluding to
    >Kock's description of autophosphorylating kinases (Biophysics of
    Computation).
    >He suggested they are analogous to transistors. With a certain amount of
    >voltage applied to them, they conduct. Without the voltage, they resist.

    Derek disputed my interpretation of autophosphorylating kinases, so I wrote
    Koch for clarification and received the following reply:

    "yeah, a kinease is just a specific type of enzyme, so they don't conduct
    electricity. So in that
    sense your neurology pal is correct. Think of the autophosphorylation like
    a button. You can press
    it in with your finger and it remains in its depressed position until you
    press it again and it
    pops back to its original state. A neat molecule."

    In reply, I asked for his opinion on the role autophosphorylating kinases
    play in signal processing, but haven't received any answer.

    After reading the Koch Lab's website (http://www.klab.caltech.edu/), I
    contacted Gabriel Kreiman. According to his website, he had done some work
    with kinases. I asked him if he could relate kinases to signal
    processing. He replied:

    "The role of kinases in signal processing is still unclear.
    They are known to be involved in memory potentitation processes."

    He pointed me to the paper: 'Tetanic Stimulation Leads to Increased
    Accumulation of Ca++/Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase II via Dendritic
    Protein Synthesis in Hippocampal Neurons (1999)
    (http://goethe.klab.caltech.edu/~gabriel/publications/camkii1.html)'
    Kreiman coauthors.

    Additionally, 'Long-Term Potentiation: What's Learning Got To Do With It?'
    by Tracey J. Shors & Louis D. Matzel (1997)
    http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/bbs/Archive/bbs.shors.html
    has an interesting survey of work on memory models, including suggestions
    that kinases are involved.

    Based on all this additional input, I want to thank Derek for pointing out
    the errors in my characterization of autophosphorylating kinases. We don't
    know what they do. We only know they are involved in neural processes and
    flip/flop between two stable states at a speed about as fast as the
    quickest reflexes.

    Mark

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 06 2000 - 00:36:37 BST