Re: Memetics a pseudoscience?

• Previous message: Mark M. Mills: "RE: Simple neural models"
• In reply to: E.M.Recio: "Memetics a pseudoscience?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id XAA05746 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 25 Jul 2000 23:50:18 +0100
Message-Id: <4.3.1.0.20000725184445.00e2f7b0@pop3.htcomp.net>
X-Sender: mmills@pop3.htcomp.net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 18:47:55 -0400
To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
From: "Mark M. Mills" <mmills@htcomp.net>
Subject: Re: Memetics a pseudoscience?
In-Reply-To: <20000725061933.21135.qmail@awcst094.netaddress.usa.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

Elmo,

You've done a fine job of outlining a way of discerning 'science' from
'pseudoscience.' Why not apply your talking points to your understanding
of memetics and let us respond to your opinion?

Mark

===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

• Next message: Chris Lofting: "RE: Gender Bias For Memes"
• Previous message: Mark M. Mills: "RE: Simple neural models"
• In reply to: E.M.Recio: "Memetics a pseudoscience?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 25 2000 - 23:51:12 BST