Re: Labels for memes

From: Robin Faichney (robin@reborntechnology.co.uk)
Date: Sat Feb 03 2001 - 09:59:37 GMT

  • Next message: Dr Able Lawrence: "Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id LAA01441 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 3 Feb 2001 11:28:15 GMT
    Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 09:59:37 +0000
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Labels for memes
    Message-ID: <20010203095937.B1161@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745C2F@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Disposition: inline
    User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i
    In-Reply-To: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745C2F@inchna.stir.ac.uk>; from v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk on Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 04:29:10PM -0000
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 04:29:10PM -0000, Vincent Campbell wrote:
    > >>Besides, surely for memetics, there needs to be more than just
    > > > >similarity, there needs to be replication?
    > >
    > <Similarity with causation is replication.>
    >
    > Having just been reading Robert Aunger's intro. to 'Darwinzing
    > Culture', I've come across an objection to this point, offered in a chapter
    > by Dan Sperber. I haven't read the whole of the Sperber chapter yet, just
    > the bit relevant to this, but I'll quote Aunger's summary of Sperber's point
    > (as it's more succinct):-
    >
    > 'As Sperber notes, many discussions in memetics do not distinguish
    > between similarity which arises from reproduction and inheritance.
    > Causation and similarity are not enough. One must also have the relevant
    > information being passed down the causal chain for true evolutionary
    > replication' (Aunger, 2000: 18).
    >
    > Sperber gives the example of laughter, which has similarity and
    > causation, but isn't replication because we don't copy other peoples'
    > laughter (2000: 168).

    When I said "Similarity with causation is replication" I was taking
    it forgranted that the similarity has to be between cause and effect,
    not merely between two effects with the same cause. I can't comment
    on Sperber's view, having only the foregoing to go on. Time to look up
    Darwinizing Culture at Amazon... I don't suppose the Introduction is
    online anywhere...

    -- 
    Robin Faichney
    robin@reborntechnology.co.uk
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 03 2001 - 11:32:14 GMT