Re: the conscious universe

From: Robin Faichney (robin@reborntechnology.co.uk)
Date: Sat Oct 07 2000 - 17:00:38 BST

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: the conscious universe"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA03521 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 7 Oct 2000 19:27:22 +0100
    Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 17:00:38 +0100
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: the conscious universe
    Message-ID: <20001007170038.B799@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    References: <20001007103535.A501@reborntechnology.co.uk> <NBBBIIDKHCMGAIPMFFPJEEFAFIAA.richard@brodietech.com>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Disposition: inline
    User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
    In-Reply-To: <NBBBIIDKHCMGAIPMFFPJEEFAFIAA.richard@brodietech.com>; from richard@brodietech.com on Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 07:49:53AM -0700
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 07:49:53AM -0700, Richard Brodie wrote:
    > I don't mean to imply anything subjective with my use of the word "mental."
    > The mind is a real, actual part of a human being (in my mind anyway).

    I agree about the reality of the mind, but others do not. Subjective, for
    me, does not mean "unreal", but for many it does. Dawkins and Dennett
    are very keen on objectivity, and view memes as objective entities.
    "Mental" does, I believe, imply "subjective", where that means not
    "unreal", but associated with the subject, concerned with perceptions
    rather than with what's "really out there", the object. Perceptions, are,
    for me, IN THEIR OWN WAY as real as what's out there, but for Dennett they
    are not. What I'm saying is that I really don't think Dennett would be
    happy with "mental information", and I don't think you should talk about
    the Dawkins/Dennett/Brodie definition, because there's no such beast.
    They're interested in neural patterns, you're interested in mental ones.
    To me, and others, these are different aspects of the same thing, but
    I don't believe Dennett takes that view. Of course, you might know
    otherwise, in which case I'll be happy to accept that I'm wrong.

    -- 
    Robin Faichney
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Oct 07 2000 - 19:28:37 BST