RE: the conscious universe

From: Richard Brodie (richard@brodietech.com)
Date: Sat Oct 07 2000 - 15:49:53 BST

  • Next message: Richard Brodie: "RE: Perishable artifacts (from: Re: the conscious universe)"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id PAA03102 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 7 Oct 2000 15:52:33 +0100
    From: "Richard Brodie" <richard@brodietech.com>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: the conscious universe
    Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 07:49:53 -0700
    Message-ID: <NBBBIIDKHCMGAIPMFFPJEEFAFIAA.richard@brodietech.com>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
    In-Reply-To: <20001007103535.A501@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
    Importance: Normal
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    I don't mean to imply anything subjective with my use of the word "mental."
    The mind is a real, actual part of a human being (in my mind anyway).

    Richard Brodie richard@brodietech.com www.liontales.com

    -----Original Message-----
    From: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk [mailto:fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk]On Behalf Of
    Robin Faichney
    Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2000 2:36 AM
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: the conscious universe

    On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 07:08:48AM -0700, Richard Brodie wrote:
    > ... the meme per its Dawkins/Dennett/Brodie
    > definition, as mental information...

    While not necessarily wanting to open this argument up again, I have,
    as usual, to point out that "mental information" implies a subjective
    phenomenon, while Dawkins and Dennett view memes as objective, neural
    information patterns. Also, in Consciousness Explained, Dennett makes
    it quite clear that he sees neural and behavioural encoding (though he
    doesn't use that word) as different phases in the meme's lifecycle.
    (Don't have the detailed citation to hand, but will get it if anyone
    requires it.)

    I think few would seriously suggest that artifacts are memes, but
    artifactual encoding of memes is another matter, and can be considered
    a subset of behavioural encoding.

    My view underwent something of a shift a few months back, whereby I
    now see the subjective aspect of the meme -- concepts and so forth --
    as being as real and as important as the objective aspect -- neurally
    and behaviourally encoded information patterns. But I don't believe
    Dennett, for one, would view it that way. He's solidly objectivist
    (though obviously not Objectivist).

    --
    Robin Faichney
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Oct 07 2000 - 15:53:44 BST