Re: Changing threads/ American Nationalism !?

From: Kenneth Van Oost (Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be)
Date: Thu Aug 24 2000 - 10:31:23 BST

  • Next message: Kenneth Van Oost: "Re: handedness and memes"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id KAA18810 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 24 Aug 2000 10:04:08 +0100
    Message-ID: <002701c00dae$35ebf2a0$3d0bbed4@default>
    From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    To: "memetics" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: Re: Changing threads/ American Nationalism !?
    Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 11:31:23 +0200
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    >
    > > Derek, hope I didn 't scare you, though !!
    > > I just meant, that the memetic transmission is in some sense Lamarckian.
    > > American citizins " copy the actions " which their government throwns
    upon
    > > them, not the instructions which political brains held at the time
    making
    > > those
    > > actions.
    > > And Derek, you are not responsible to put Lamarckism back on track, it
    is
    > > just that American political thought is enbedded in some Lamarckian
    > primeval
    > > soup. And Lamarckism is " a new thread ", yes thanks to us, we use
    > > Lamarckian principles in order to explain some events happening in
    > cultural
    > > and social exchange, don 't we !?
    > > Please check out John Wilkins' essay " The appearance of Lamarckism
    > in the evolution of culture ".
    > Maybe the implications of such a thread are not clear as yet, but we can
    't
    > deny their consequences, can we !?
    > If we do that, we are no better than those who discredited Lamarck in the
    > first place. It is maby a result of that our brains are set to Darwinism
    !?
    > Like I said, some parts of the cultural process seems to be Lamarckian, it
    > is up to us to solve the mistery...
    >
    > > Regards,
    > >
    > > Kenneth
    > >
    > > ( I am, because we are)
    > >
    > > ----- Original Message -----
    > > From: Gatherer, D. (Derek) <D.Gatherer@organon.nhe.akzonobel.nl>
    > > To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    > > Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2000 8:37 AM
    > > Subject: RE: Changing threads/ American Nationalism !?
    > >
    > >
    > > > Kenneth:
    > > > Remerber, it is only for a few years now that Lamarckism is back on
    > track
    > > > and that is due to us, the memetisists !
    > > >
    > > > Derek:
    > > > Lamarckism is back on track? Since when? And it's due to us? How?
    I
    > > hope
    > > > I am never responsible for putting Lamarckism back on track.
    > > >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 24 2000 - 10:05:15 BST