Re: Changing threads/ American Nationalism !?

From: Kenneth Van Oost (Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be)
Date: Thu Aug 24 2000 - 10:14:54 BST

  • Next message: Kenneth Van Oost: "Re: Changing threads/ American Nationalism !?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id JAA18764 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 24 Aug 2000 09:46:37 +0100
    Message-ID: <000901c00dab$c5255220$3d0bbed4@default>
    From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    References: <A4400389479FD3118C9400508B0FF230040F13@DELTA>
    Subject: Re: Changing threads/ American Nationalism !?
    Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 11:14:54 +0200
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Derek, hope I didn 't scare you, though !!
    I just meant, that the memetic transmission is in some sense Lamarckian.
    American citizins " copy the actions " which their government throwns upon
    them, not the instructions which political brains held at the time making
    those
    actions.
    And Derek, you are not responsible to put Lamarckism back on track, it is
    just that American political thought is enbedded in some Lamarckian primeval
    soup. And Lamarckism is " a new thread ", yes thanks to us, we use
    Lamarckian principles in order to explain some events happening in cultural
    and social exchange, don 't we !?

    regards,

    Kenneth

    ( I am, because we are)

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Gatherer, D. (Derek) <D.Gatherer@organon.nhe.akzonobel.nl>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2000 8:37 AM
    Subject: RE: Changing threads/ American Nationalism !?

    > Kenneth:
    > Remerber, it is only for a few years now that Lamarckism is back on track
    > and that is due to us, the memetisists !
    >
    > Derek:
    > Lamarckism is back on track? Since when? And it's due to us? How? I
    hope
    > I am never responsible for putting Lamarckism back on track.
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 24 2000 - 09:47:41 BST