RE: Cons and Facades - more on truth

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Tue Jun 20 2000 - 14:47:23 BST

  • Next message: Chris Lofting: "RE: Cons and Facades - more on truth"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id OAA08346 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 20 Jun 2000 14:50:16 +0100
    Subject: RE: Cons and Facades - more on truth
    Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 09:47:23 -0400
    x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu
    x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas est veritas
    From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
    To: "memetics list" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Message-ID: <20000620134800.AAA1824@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On 06/20/00 09:43, Chris Lofting said this-

    >Have a look at some of the NLP material (NeuroLinguistic Programming). Much
    >has been dressed up in some fancy terms but the basics are valid, i.e. use
    >of representations systems based on sensory biases (vision, audition,
    >kinesthetics, gustatory, olfactory -- all analogue based) and the a-to-d
    >conversion to language. Establishing rapport and creating a slight trance
    >state and then delivering the message. Advertising companies, sales teams,
    >and political groups are getting into this.
    >
    >Different persona types will respond in different ways but these can be
    >mapped and so we can create algorithms used to target a persona group or an
    >individual without their knowing or permission.
    >
    >The system 'works' since they use the layering of dichotomisations and that
    >sets off resonances 'in here'. Most have no idea what they are dealing
    >with -- unfortunate but then the attitude is 'who cares, we are making
    >money!'. They are into the expression rather than what is behind that
    >expression, which is what memetics is about.
    >
    >Some of the material is dangerous in that I can easily send someone home
    >with mental 'gun' if I am not careful about how I do things.

    Could you supply any referential material to get me to accept this as
    anything other than a specious claim of ego-biased influence-peddling?

    Like, showing me the smoking gun...?

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jun 20 2000 - 14:51:03 BST