Re: What is "useful"; what is "survival"

From: chuck (cpalson@mediaone.net)
Date: Thu May 25 2000 - 13:59:31 BST

  • Next message: chuck: "Re: Shaving"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA07175 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 25 May 2000 19:01:42 +0100
    Message-ID: <392D23B3.A910F947@mediaone.net>
    Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 13:59:31 +0100
    From: chuck <cpalson@mediaone.net>
    X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (WinNT; I)
    X-Accept-Language: en
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: What is "useful"; what is "survival"
    References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745875@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Vincent Campbell wrote:

    > 'Most social scientists simply assume there are
    > > no explanations for certain things and don't try to investigate any
    > > further.'
    > >
    > Hmm, nice to see accusations of sweeping assumptions being made, in, oh, a
    > sweeping assumption!

    I have been probing the social sciences with a lot of energy for 4 decades, so I
    have a pretty good idea of what's out there. It's not an assumption, it's actual
    research.

    >
    >
    > > ----------
    > > From: chuck
    > > Reply To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > > Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 5:01 pm
    > > To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > > Subject: Re: What is "useful"; what is "survival"
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > "Wade T.Smith" wrote:
    > >
    > > > On 05/24/00 06:49, Vincent Campbell said this-
    > > >
    > > > >(The point about seppuku, was that this is a ritual behaviour that has
    > > > >persisted for many generations explicitly involving suicide- how do you
    > > > >explain it?)
    > > >
    > > > Perhaps with the same breath that explains Clinton's _not_ performing
    > > > such a ceremony in the face of precisely a situation in which the
    > > > nipponese culture would demand it.
    > >
    > > >
    > > > Which is to say, there is no simple explanation for the strength of a
    > > > culture or the directions is allows.
    > > >
    > >
    > > You missed my point, Wade. The difference is to what extent reputation
    > > plays
    > > a role in each society because of ecological conditions. In this country,
    > > if
    > > you get a bad reputation in one town, you can simply move to another town
    > > or
    > > state, set up residence by showing your bank account, and start anew. Ask
    > > any European who has moved here, and they will tell you they are
    > > astonished
    > > by this -- and usually love it (although perhaps academics are out of the
    > > loop). In a land short country like Japan where people must stay in one
    > > place, they don't have that option. That is why the stain generally lasts
    > > and is far more serious than here.
    > >
    > > Actually, I should substitute the word land for resources for modern
    > > industrial societies. I have tested this out cross culturally and it has
    > > works every time. This continuum seems to work in the orient also as well
    > > as within the US. I know of no people that relies less on reputation to
    > > evaluate their countrymen, and it is a defining characteristic of our
    > > mentality.
    > >
    > > And, yes there are explanations for the strength of *every* cultural
    > > traits
    > > because the culture of a people is its tool kit for living, not simply a
    > > pretty thing to wear or eat. Most social scientists simply assume there
    > > are
    > > no explanations for certain things and don't try to investigate any
    > > further.
    > > Just about everyone on this listserv, for example, believes this as a
    > > matter
    > > of faith. The most recent such investigator is Fukuyama who states
    > > outright
    > > that 20% of culture is free variation, a figure he pulls out of the air
    > > without being challenged.
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > >
    > > > - Wade
    > > >
    > > > ===============================================================
    > > > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > > > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > > > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > > > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    > >
    > >
    > > ===============================================================
    > > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    > >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 25 2000 - 19:02:14 BST