Just surviving in S. California?

From: Chuck Palson (cpalson@mediaone.net)
Date: Wed May 17 2000 - 09:00:47 BST

  • Next message: Bill Spight: "Re: Useless memes"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id PAA00276 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 17 May 2000 15:07:01 +0100
    Message-ID: <392251AF.9143913D@mediaone.net>
    Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 09:00:47 +0100
    From: Chuck Palson <cpalson@mediaone.net>
    X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (WinNT; I)
    X-Accept-Language: en
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Just surviving in S. California?
    References: <NBBBIIDKHCMGAIPMFFPJGEAOENAA.richard@brodietech.com>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Richard Brodie tells me in a recent posting that people don't worry about
    survival anymore in S. Cal because it's so easy. That's important because, if
    true, the idea of a meme useful for survival would be ridiculous.

    In fact, the economy Southern California along with several pockets of
    prosperity in the world today and in the past raises some interesting questions
    about useful memes. Other places would include places like Kuwait (pre Gulf
    war), parts of post 1870s during the prosperity years, and Holland in the 1500s
    during the tulip mania. In other words, bubble economies.

    But before I answer why these examples offer possible exceptions that prove the
    rule, let's look at the survival word. It conjures up images of barely surviving
    - just the basics like food, water, and protection from the elements. It may
    even conjure up images of coping with large predator animals -- hunting and
    eating them. But survival is not necessarily just these things - although they
    may include them. The necessities of survival depend on the type of society as
    the context. Defined, it's "getting the goods and services needed to participate
    in the basics of that society." In turn, those basics are really quite necessary
    for the continued reproduction of that society. An early American farmer didn't
    need to send his kids to college, and the society as a whole didn't need that
    kind of specialized knowledge to survive, so there were few colleges. That
    changed gradually; today we have to send our kids to college. Further, we have
    to be able to afford a house in a neighborhood where there is a good high school
    or we have to send them off to private high school. If you follow the chain of
    goods and services you need to survive in this society, you find that the vast
    majority of people are still using the problem solving skills our
    hunter/gatherer needed to earn a living; it's just another set of situations
    they apply themselves to. Modern society does have some such skills that are a
    stretch; computer programing and other highly logical tasks (like the sciences)
    run on a set of logical constructs that are not tied to any content in
    particular. That's a big difference, of course, because it means we are
    producing products that we often can't touch or see for a long time, if ever.
    That kind of thing challenges our brains quite a bit; it's like making virtual
    products. Just how important differences like these make is still an open
    question, but it does make a difference.

    But in any event, the vast majority of the world's population - even in the
    United States, spend a huge part of their waking ours working to survive.

    That said, bubble economies function under slightly different conditions **for
    as long as they last**; they are the equivalent in some ways to an infernal
    machine that has defied gravity. Our brains have not evolved to be completely
    outside of any conditions of necessity, so when we are in such conditions, some
    strange things happen. We can reproduce a bit of this kind of condition in
    animals by simply giving them an overabundance of what they need. Their
    sexuality is the first thing to go wacky because sexuality is the center of the
    social lives of those animals that are social. And once the sexuality is wacked
    out, the rest of social behavior also becomes disoriented. The sexuality of an
    animal evolved within a particular type of environment which means that the
    sexual habits need a particular set of material circumstances to maintain those
    habits. I like to say that the sexuality of a species is "calibrated" to a
    particular kind of environment.

    What does this mean in particular? If the females are engineered to choose a
    mate on the basis of their ability to provide during the reproductive phase, and
    that requirement is obviated by a sudden abundance that results in all males
    being equally able to provide, the mating habits go out the window. That is why
    sexuality goes wacky if there is a sudden lasting abundance.

    In human societies we can get the same thing. Status, for example, needs a
    certain amount of scarcity to exist. Those who can procure the scarce goods and
    services achieve status. We, like all social animals, are a status seeking
    animal that, American democratic ideals aside, still thoroughly penetrate our
    social life. (The word status is sometimes confusing for people; you can use
    position or relative position as a substitute and get the idea). Status is
    directly linked to sexuality.

    Now, let's see what happens to status in times and places where economic bubbles
    appear. There is first an attempt to modify what constitutes status. Should it
    be diamonds? Travel? Number of houses? Cars? That's not easy to figure out, and,
    in fact, it gets pretty artificial because no matter what you do, you are
    literally thowing money at the problem - which a lot of other people can do
    also. Back in the last century Thorstein Veblin called this "conspicuous
    consumption" and disdained all the neuveau riche doing it because the spending
    was so frenetic and apparently stupid or - to use a the key word here,
    *useless*. Veblin's term applies nicely today in Southern California or at any
    other time and place where there are or have been bubbles.

    There is another kind of situation that resembles in many ways the condition of
    super prosperity: academia. Its causes are in some ways the same: a society that
    can afford to pay people to just think about subjects in the humanities. Status
    under such conditions is very poorly defined, and academics are far less aware
    of the material necesssities of life than the ordinary citizen. The actual
    material world that others must survive in has receded quite a bit in the
    academic world. And so it should be no surprise that they look on the outside
    world with puzzlement, wondering of what use the goods and services that are
    circulating around. In one such example on an English campus, a famous memeic
    researcher seriously proposed that people did not need of faxes and the
    operating systems of computers. The principle is nothing new. Back in the 19th
    century it was common for academics to propose that ideas alone moved the world.

    So, in answer to Richard Brode, it may very well be the case that S. Cal is in
    the throes of a bubble economy that produces memes that are rather thin on use
    value. But S. Cal isn't the world, it's an exception that proves the rule that
    memes must, under normal conditions of human existence, have substantial use
    value to be adopted.

    In all probability, then, these bubble situations will pass and people will look
    back on them and wonder why they could have acted the way they did. Baby boomers
    look back on the late sixties, another bubble period, and realize they did some
    pretty stupid things. Traditional courting practices went down the tubes, and so
    did sexuality. Suddenly it was taken literally that having sex in public was an
    effective way to oppose the war. We don't hear baby boomers saying these days
    how stupid that was, but you can bet that in the privacy of their own minds they
    feel a bit stupid about it. If you are a student of human behavior, the
    important thing to remember in the middle of a bubble period is that the
    behavior is not representative of the vast majority of our species.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 17 2000 - 16:07:19 BST