Re: new line: what's the point?

From: Joe E. Dees (joedees@bellsouth.net)
Date: Sun Mar 05 2000 - 06:03:31 GMT

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: new line: what's the point?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id GAA11487 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 5 Mar 2000 06:01:30 GMT
    Message-Id: <200003050559.AAA08690@mail6.lig.bellsouth.net>
    From: "Joe E. Dees" <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2000 00:03:31 -0600
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: new line: what's the point?
    In-reply-to: <00030505164401.00357@faichney>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12b)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    From: Robin Faichney <robin@faichney.demon.co.uk>
    Organization: Reborn Technology
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: new line: what's the point?
    Date sent: Sun, 5 Mar 2000 05:13:14 +0000
    Send reply to: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    > On Fri, 03 Mar 2000, Joe E. Dees wrote:
    > >
    > >>...do you or don't you deny the possibility of
    > >> mechanistic memetic explanations?
    > >>
    > >Not if it involves the excision of meaning (semantics), intention or
    > >selfawareness, but I do not believe it does.
    >
    > You have said that meme selection occurs only via conscious choice. Do you
    > think that is compatable with mechanistic memetic explanation?
    >
    I believe that there can be accidentally or inadvertantly
    communicated (on either or both the transmission and the
    reception end) memes, but the very distinction exists only given
    the prior existence of conscious choice, with which the accidental
    and inadvertant can be compared and contrasted. Most memes,
    and especially successfully selected ones, are transmitted and
    attended to by choice, because to choose to transmit and/or
    receive them is believed to hold some positive value for the
    transmitter/receiver, or to choose to forbear from such memetic
    transmission/reception is believed to hold some negative value for
    the transmitter/receiver, or both.
    > --
    > Robin Faichney
    >
    >
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 05 2000 - 06:01:35 GMT