Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id FAA11380 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 5 Mar 2000 05:24:23 GMT From: Robin Faichney <robin@faichney.demon.co.uk> Organization: Reborn Technology To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk Subject: Re: new line: what's the point? Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2000 05:13:14 +0000 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.21] Content-Type: text/plain References: <200003030152.UAA03283@mail4.lig.bellsouth.net> Message-Id: <00030505164401.00357@faichney> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
On Fri, 03 Mar 2000, Joe E. Dees wrote:
>
>>...do you or don't you deny the possibility of
>> mechanistic memetic explanations?
>>
>Not if it involves the excision of meaning (semantics), intention or
>selfawareness, but I do not believe it does.
You have said that meme selection occurs only via conscious choice. Do you
think that is compatable with mechanistic memetic explanation?
-- Robin Faichney===============================This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 05 2000 - 05:24:32 GMT