Re: Determinism

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Thu Apr 12 2001 - 04:24:11 BST

  • Next message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "Re: Determinism"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id EAA23623 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 12 Apr 2001 04:21:35 +0100
    From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 22:24:11 -0500
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: Determinism
    Message-ID: <3AD4D98B.6168.309AE9@localhost>
    In-reply-to: <00c601c0c2a4$ea66bac0$5eaefea9@rcn.com>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On 11 Apr 2001, at 12:31, Aaron Agassi wrote:

    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: "Robin Faichney" <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    > To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    > Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 6:18 AM
    > Subject: Re: Determinism
    >
    >
    > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 12:45:41AM -0500, joedees@bellsouth.net
    > > wrote:
    > > >
    > > > > The only way two scenarios can be absolutely identical is if you
    > > > > look at one scenario twice. In which case, the same decision
    > > > > would be made.
    > > > >
    > > > > I hope you don't think that's a glib or tricksy answer. I mean
    > > > > it absolutely seriously. If everything is the same, then
    > > > > everything will be the same.
    > > > >
    > > > But the same situation cannot ever recur; even memory of the first
    > > > would be too much, as would the simple molecular changes of
    > > > ourselves and our environs. The impossible is an illegitimate
    > > > hypothetical.
    > >
    > > If you'd been reading to understand, rather than skimming to argue,
    > > you'd have seen that's exactly what I meant.
    > >
    > But he assumes that limits to simulation must also then apply to
    > initial reality!
    >
    No, I'm saying that since nonrepeatable situations (such as
    historical ones repeated absolutely exactly) cannot by definition be
    rerun, it is a logically misplaced article of faith to assume any
    result whatsoever from such impossible trials.
    > > --
    > > Robin Faichney
    > > Get your Meta-Information from http://www.ii01.org
    > > (CAUTION: contains philosophy, may cause heads to spin)
    > >
    > > =============================================================== This
    > > was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of
    > > Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For
    > > information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see:
    > > http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    > >
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Apr 12 2001 - 04:24:33 BST