Re: Determinism

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Mon Apr 09 2001 - 09:59:38 BST

  • Next message: Chris Taylor: "Re: Determinism"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id JAA15924 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 9 Apr 2001 09:57:09 +0100
    From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 03:59:38 -0500
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: Determinism
    Message-ID: <3AD133AA.6664.BBCD42@localhost>
    In-reply-to: <20010405083612.A986@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    References: <013f01c0bd6b$21682e80$5eaefea9@rcn.com>; from agassi@erols.com on Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 08:55:38PM -0400
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On 5 Apr 2001, at 8:36, Robin Faichney wrote:

    > On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 08:55:38PM -0400, Aaron Agassi wrote:
    > >
    > > > > > > > > > > Free choices being subjective, then, do not
    > > > > > > > > > > contradict with
    > > > > > > objective
    > > > > > > > > > > determinism.
    > > > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > > > You got it!
    > > > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > > > Now all we have to do is get it clear that
    > > > > > > > > > subjectivity is not
    > > > > > > generally
    > > > > > > > > > inferior (or superior) to objectivity.
    > > > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > > What ever are you talking about?
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > Again, I have to spell it out: despite being subjective,
    > > > > > > > freedom
    > > is
    > > > > just
    > > > > > > > as real as -- something real.
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > Where does superiority or inferiority come into it?
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Illusions are generally considered inferior to real phenomena.
    > > > > >
    > > > > I don't understand.
    > > >
    > > > Don't you prefer reality over dealing with illusions?
    > > >
    > > Preference is another question.
    >
    > I don't think it's entirely rational either, but you'll find there's
    > quite a widespread preference for objectivity over subjectivity.
    >
    Which is quite strange, considering that objectivity is unattainable;
    the best we can do is intersubjective agreement.
    > --
    > Robin Faichney
    > Get your Meta-Information from http://www.ii01.org
    > (CAUTION: contains philosophy, may cause heads to spin)
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 09 2001 - 10:02:32 BST