Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id PAA16586 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 9 Apr 2001 15:53:11 +0100 Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 15:49:21 +0100 To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk Subject: Re: Determinism Message-ID: <20010409154921.A1050@reborntechnology.co.uk> References: <013f01c0bd6b$21682e80$5eaefea9@rcn.com>; <20010405083612.A986@reborntechnology.co.uk> <3AD133AA.6664.BBCD42@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i In-Reply-To: <3AD133AA.6664.BBCD42@localhost>; from joedees@bellsouth.net on Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 03:59:38AM -0500 From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk> Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 03:59:38AM -0500, joedees@bellsouth.net wrote:
> On 5 Apr 2001, at 8:36, Robin Faichney wrote:
>
> > I don't think it's entirely rational either, but you'll find there's
> > quite a widespread preference for objectivity over subjectivity.
> >
> Which is quite strange, considering that objectivity is unattainable;
> the best we can do is intersubjective agreement.
So that's not your reason for rejecting subjective/objective
compatibilism. Interesting.
-- Robin Faichney Get your Meta-Information from http://www.ii01.org (CAUTION: contains philosophy, may cause heads to spin)=============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 09 2001 - 15:58:32 BST