Re: Determinism

From: Robin Faichney (robin@reborntechnology.co.uk)
Date: Wed Apr 04 2001 - 18:52:08 BST

  • Next message: Kenneth Van Oost: "Re: taboos"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA01140 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 4 Apr 2001 18:58:13 +0100
    Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 18:52:08 +0100
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Determinism
    Message-ID: <20010404185208.B1269@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745D64@inchna.stir.ac.uk> <20010404165201.B551@reborntechnology.co.uk> <012d01c0bd23$20d970c0$5eaefea9@rcn.com>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Disposition: inline
    User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
    In-Reply-To: <012d01c0bd23$20d970c0$5eaefea9@rcn.com>; from agassi@erols.com on Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 12:20:13PM -0400
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 12:20:13PM -0400, Aaron Agassi wrote:
    >
    > > On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 04:33:34PM +0100, Vincent Campbell wrote:
    > > > That might negate my freedom, but surely it enhances yours?
    > >
    > > If what we're discussing is determinism, then the point is that, if
    > > you were perfectly knowable, then determinism would be true (of you,
    > > at least).
    > >
    > > However, I also go along with Aaron in saying that if I'm omniscient
    > > then I always know what the best course of action is and I have no choice
    > > but to take that course.
    > >
    > > You are free because you are not perfectly knowable, and I am free
    > > because I'm uncertain.
    > >
    > > (Actually, being *basically* similar, we're both free for both reasons.)
    > >
    > Yes, freedom is subjective.
    >
    > Again, what is uncertainty, except imperfect knowledge?

    Who ever said it was anything else? What is your problem?

    > Mythic
    > Indeterminacy, after all, is quite another matter.

    Which is why, as I've already said quite clearly, it's irrelevant.
    (Ignoring that first word as incomprehensible in this context.)

    -- 
    Robin Faichney
    Get your Meta-Information from http://www.ii01.org
    (CAUTION: contains philosophy, may cause heads to spin)
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 04 2001 - 19:04:18 BST