Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Sun Feb 18 2001 - 08:35:03 GMT

  • Next message: Kenneth Van Oost: "Re: Genome Project"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id IAA05658 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 18 Feb 2001 08:31:15 GMT
    From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 02:35:03 -0600
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution
    Message-ID: <3A8F34D7.4931.30CE455@localhost>
    In-reply-to: <F163pcQABZTW5k1Ed2800009330@hotmail.com>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On 18 Feb 2001, at 3:19, Scott Chase wrote:

    >
    >
    >
    >
    > >From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    > >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > >To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > >Subject: Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution
    > >Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 21:34:29 -0600
    > >
    > >On 17 Feb 2001, at 21:31, Wade T.Smith wrote:
    > >
    > > > Hi Joe E. Dees -
    > > >
    > > > >And thus begins the endless journey into the semiotic web, where
    > > > >each word meaning depends upon the meanings of a plethora of
    > > > >others, endlessly.
    > > >
    > > > Which I'll graciously if hangheadedly admit to undertaking,
    > > > perhaps all too often. But I remain somewhat confused about how
    > > > one can talk about stability within dynamic processes, although,
    > > > even the river's banks stay on their sides.
    > > >
    > >One may refer to stability not only as homeostasis, which is
    > >remaining at a particular position, but also as homeorrhesis, which
    > >is maintaining a particular rate of change.
    > >
    > >
    >
    > (bq) "At the stage of ontogenetic development (Piaget's reference to a
    > subsequent section of the book omitted) the central problem is that of
    > the dynamic equilibrium of "channeled" formations- "homeorhesis,"
    > which Waddington has rightly differentiated from homeostasis." (eq)
    >
    > from page 12 of Jean Piaget's _Biology and Knowledge: an Essay on the
    > Relations between Organic Regulations and Cognitive Processes_ (1971.
    > The University of Chicago Press. Chicago)
    >
    > I expect grumblings from a certain PhD candidate from Australia about
    > my reading this abysmal book by our favorite pond snail enthusiast
    > with a penchant for developmental psychology and the effect of James
    > Mark Baldwin.
    >
    I'm impressed. And I also recommend (at least!) four of his other
    books: (1) THE EQUILIBRATION OF COGNITIVE STRUCTURES:
    THE CENTRAL PROBLEM OF INTELLECTUAL DEVELOPMENT,
    (2) THE PRINCIPLES OF GENETIC EPISTEMOLOGY, (3) THE
    GRASP OF CONSCIOUSNESS, and (4) STRUCTURALISM.
    > _________________________________________________________________ Get
    > your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 18 2001 - 08:33:25 GMT