Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution

From: Scott Chase (ecphoric@hotmail.com)
Date: Sun Feb 18 2001 - 08:19:45 GMT

  • Next message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id IAA05567 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 18 Feb 2001 08:22:14 GMT
    X-Originating-IP: [209.240.220.240]
    From: "Scott Chase" <ecphoric@hotmail.com>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution
    Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 03:19:45 -0500
    Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
    Message-ID: <F163pcQABZTW5k1Ed2800009330@hotmail.com>
    X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Feb 2001 08:19:46.0163 (UTC) FILETIME=[8D971C30:01C09983]
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    >From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >Subject: Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution
    >Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 21:34:29 -0600
    >
    >On 17 Feb 2001, at 21:31, Wade T.Smith wrote:
    >
    > > Hi Joe E. Dees -
    > >
    > > >And thus begins the endless journey into the semiotic web, where each
    > > >word meaning depends upon the meanings of a plethora of others,
    > > >endlessly.
    > >
    > > Which I'll graciously if hangheadedly admit to undertaking, perhaps
    > > all too often. But I remain somewhat confused about how one can talk
    > > about stability within dynamic processes, although, even the river's
    > > banks stay on their sides.
    > >
    >One may refer to stability not only as homeostasis, which is
    >remaining at a particular position, but also as homeorrhesis, which
    >is maintaining a particular rate of change.
    >
    >

    (bq) "At the stage of ontogenetic development (Piaget's reference to a
    subsequent section of the book omitted) the central problem is that of the
    dynamic equilibrium of "channeled" formations- "homeorhesis," which
    Waddington has rightly differentiated from homeostasis." (eq)

    from page 12 of Jean Piaget's _Biology and Knowledge: an Essay on the
    Relations between Organic Regulations and Cognitive Processes_ (1971. The
    University of Chicago Press. Chicago)

    I expect grumblings from a certain PhD candidate from Australia about my
    reading this abysmal book by our favorite pond snail enthusiast with a
    penchant for developmental psychology and the effect of James Mark Baldwin.
    _________________________________________________________________
    Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 18 2001 - 08:24:29 GMT