Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Sun Feb 18 2001 - 08:13:11 GMT

  • Next message: Scott Chase: "Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id IAA05473 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 18 Feb 2001 08:09:23 GMT
    From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 02:13:11 -0600
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution
    Message-ID: <3A8F2FB7.21994.2F8E12D@localhost>
    In-reply-to: <F14296PnPlpNvHXsprw0000d51a@hotmail.com>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On 18 Feb 2001, at 3:00, Scott Chase wrote:

    >
    A classic example is D'Arcy Thompson's work ON GROWTH AND
    FORM.
    >
    >
    >
    > >From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
    > >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > >To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    > >Subject: Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution
    > >Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 21:31:53 -0500
    > >
    > >Hi Joe E. Dees -
    > >
    > > >And thus begins the endless journey into the semiotic web, where
    > > >each word meaning depends upon the meanings of a plethora of
    > > >others, endlessly.
    > >
    > >Which I'll graciously if hangheadedly admit to undertaking, perhaps
    > >all too often. But I remain somewhat confused about how one can talk
    > >about stability within dynamic processes, although, even the river's
    > >banks stay on their sides.
    > >
    > >
    > There is some stability in developmental processes. At least for
    > vertebrates there's a basic body plan (bauplan) and a procession
    > through a relatively conserved phylotypic period of development where
    > one sees things like a notochord, post anal tail, and pharyngeal
    > apparatus (arches and pouches). Vertebrates are known to have dorsal
    > hollow central nervous systems too. >From these shared beginnings
    > vertebrate embryos diverge from their archetype along pathways that
    > show major variations on a theme. Whether this phylotypic stability
    > reflects developmental constraint or stabilizing selection is a matter
    > of debate.
    >
    > Reading some Piaget recently, I'm tempted to invoke canalization or
    > chreodes (sensu Waddington), where one can visualize a river bed of
    > sorts, a necessary path.
    > _________________________________________________________________ Get
    > your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 18 2001 - 08:11:35 GMT