Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution

From: Mark Mills (mmills@htcomp.net)
Date: Sat Feb 17 2001 - 19:43:39 GMT

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA03903 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 17 Feb 2001 19:50:52 GMT
    Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.0.20010217133259.0219e910@pop3.htcomp.net>
    X-Sender: mmills@pop3.htcomp.net
    X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2
    Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 13:43:39 -0600
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    From: Mark Mills <mmills@htcomp.net>
    Subject: Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution
    In-Reply-To: <3A8EC7AF.95BD4A91@pacbell.net>
    References: <5.0.2.1.0.20010217113823.021498a0@pop3.htcomp.net>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    At 10:49 AM 2/17/01 -0800, you wrote:
    >But the idea of a memetic germ line is still a problem. Memory
    >organization does not pass directly from person to person, while genes
    >and chromosomes do pass directly from parent to child.

    Maybe the term 'ontogenetic replicator' would make more sense? That's the
    model I'm suggesting.

    Once ontogeny starts, the organism begins memorizing. The memory
    structures that can be replicated are memes. Consider the notion of an
    'object-oriented database' with multiple levels of organization and the
    ability to bootstrap itself. That's the model I have in mind. An
    object-oriented datastructure that builds itself.

    The fact that cellular replication uses source DNA does and memetics uses
    sources itself does not change the parallel nature of the activity.

    I think the recent publication of human genome findings supports this
    objected oriented, bootstrapping datastructure concept. Both memes and
    genes use it. The difference is their substrates.

    >Thus, the phenotype-genotype distinction you make does not serve the
    >same purpose in memetics as the similar distinction does in genetics.

    What do you mean by this?

    Mark

    http://www.htcomp.net/markmills

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 17 2001 - 19:53:03 GMT