Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA03813 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 17 Feb 2001 19:31:24 GMT Subject: Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 14:28:55 -0500 x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20010217192855.AAA11166@camailp.harvard.edu@[205.240.180.166]> Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Hi Bill Spight -
>Yes, it can quite uncomfortable if your bicycle does not fit. Don't slip
>off. ;-)
Bicycle fit is indeed important. And there are many schools of thought
about how to fit one's bicycle to one's body and riding style.
This sort of fit, however, seems to be what is talked about- the fit of
maleable items to one another.
I really don't think life, nature, and evolution work like wrenches and
parts catalogs....
And I'm not sure memetics has such resources either.
- Wade
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 17 2001 - 19:33:36 GMT