Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Tue Feb 06 2001 - 20:10:59 GMT

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA17896 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 6 Feb 2001 20:14:20 GMT
Subject: Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 15:10:59 -0500
x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu
x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
To: "memetics list" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-ID: <20010206200954.AAA22253@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]>
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    On 02/06/01 12:55, Bill Spight said this-

    >I agree that memetic evolution is Lamarckian

    And, IMHO, there is no such thing as Lamarckian evolution.

    Where to go...?

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 06 2001 - 20:16:17 GMT