Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id VAA18048 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 30 Jan 2001 21:36:22 GMT From: "Lawrence DeBivort" <debivort@umd5.umd.edu> To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Subject: RE: Labels for memes Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:42:55 -0500 Message-ID: <002201c08b05$b46b4480$8663b8d0@wwa> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <20010130194202.A2584@reborntechnology.co.uk> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Robin, can you define how you are using the term 'information' below,
please?
Thanks,
-Lawrence
-----Original Message-----
From: Robin Faichney
> seeing it was useful to have a word referring specifically to mental
> replicators...
This is irrelevant. I'm not saying other replicators should be considered
memes, I'm saying imitated patterns of behaviour are identical with your
"mental replicators". Given an understanding of information, these are
precisely the same thing.
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 30 2001 - 21:38:16 GMT