Re: memetics and knowledge

From: Joe E. Dees (joedees@bellsouth.net)
Date: Tue Sep 19 2000 - 20:00:36 BST

  • Next message: Kenneth Van Oost: "Re: Part One --- Outline -- A-F revision one."

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA06993 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 19 Sep 2000 19:58:17 +0100
    Message-Id: <200009191859.OAA29831@mail1.lig.bellsouth.net>
    From: "Joe E. Dees" <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 14:00:36 -0500
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: memetics and knowledge
    In-reply-to: <20000919190845.A1456@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    References: <200009190330.XAA15434@mail3.lig.bellsouth.net>; from joedees@bellsouth.net on Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 10:33:47PM -0500
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.01b)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Date sent: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 19:08:45 +0100
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: memetics and knowledge
    Send reply to: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    > On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 10:33:47PM -0500, Joe E. Dees wrote:
    > > Actually, when people first hear the multiplication tables, they have
    > > trouble with them; it takes a bit of practice and attention to 'get
    > > them down', just as riding a bike takes a while before one masters
    > > balance. However, in both cases, once it is routinized, the skill
    > > becomes automatic, requiring practically no conscious attention to
    > > exercise.
    >
    > And what does that tell us about whether all knowledge can be verbalized?
    >
    All knowledge can be verbalized to some degree; you were
    maintaining that 'mystical knowledge' could not be verbalized AT
    ALL, and yet it somehow qualified as knowledge. I answer that
    there is no special knowledge class reserved for mystics, yogis,
    shamans and secret chiefs; if they know it, they can say it to
    some degree, just like anyone else - an english or science teacher
    or a driving instructor - can. You seem to be putting forth the
    absurd proposition that if one cannot explain something so
    perfectly to everyone that they all epiphanically grok it in its
    fullness immediately, then it cannot be verbalized at all, while I
    answer, quite reasonably, that all knowledge worthy of the
    appelation falls into the world of concrete learning and
    experience between such irreal extremes.
    > --
    > Robin Faichney
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Sep 19 2000 - 19:59:28 BST