Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA15735 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 16 Jul 2000 20:40:54 +0100 Message-ID: <002b01bfef61$862c9c80$c409bed4@default> From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be> To: "memetics" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Subject: Re: point of memetic saturation Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 21:41:38 +0200 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000F_01BFEF6E.9F55BAE0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Chris, you wrote
<< At the basic level in only ONE object, MANY aspects.>>
Back again to my earlier post.
I am an individualist, but I need SAMENESS in order to survive.
So, I don 't like collectives [ONE object] but in MANY aspects I need it in
order to survive !?
Correct !?
<< Advance the neurology and you start to be discerning about OBJECTS >>
So, in my case, I don 't like SAMENESS but in my mind I see through some
aspects of SAMENESS, I see the DIFFERENCE behind the SAMENESS and
I do survive without a scratch !? Is this something I do conscient or are my
epigenetic rules, my semantic impresses just made up for that kind of task !?
If they are, that should proove a point !!
Great stuff !!
To the question of self-building via memes concept a remarkable idea
Regards,
Kenneth
(I am, because we are) devoted
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jul 16 2000 - 20:42:43 BST