Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA15730 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 16 Jul 2000 20:40:52 +0100 Message-ID: <002a01bfef61$856ad320$c409bed4@default> From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be> To: "memetics" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Subject: Re: point of memetic saturation Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 21:25:07 +0200 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_01BFEF6C.5060F0A0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Chris, you wrote,
<< There is a strong emphasis on not being able to group, which means not
being able to abstract DIFFERENCE, only SAMENESS,...>>
What about if we employ this onto humans, like I posted before, I am a in-
dividualist, I don 't like very much a group, but I do like DIFFERENCE.
SAMENESS is to me like a red rag to a bull !!
( Again that colour !)
Regards,
Kenneth
(I am, because we are) busy again
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jul 16 2000 - 20:41:43 BST