RE: point of memetic saturation

From: Wesley Biggs (wbiggs@elite.com)
Date: Sun Jul 09 2000 - 23:46:53 BST

  • Next message: Chris Lofting: "RE: Philosophy of Technology"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id XAA27496 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 9 Jul 2000 23:47:23 +0100
    Message-ID: <D6F9138561A6D31181E3009027E40C0EFD4B2D@mailhost2.elite.com>
    From: Wesley Biggs <wbiggs@elite.com>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: point of memetic saturation 
    Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2000 15:46:53 -0700 
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Hello, Kenneth invited me to join this discussion, so I will, but with the
    disclaimer that I am just an interested party, not an expert on the topic.

    > Memes are making us create not only more and more outlets for meme
    > transmission (e.g. 3rd generation mobile phones), but also new receptacles
    > for memes in artificial intelligence- although we are some way I assume
    from
    > achieving that.

    Very true. This points to the dependence of memes on genes. I don't think
    memes can evolve without a host culture. Eco's "The Name of the Rose" is a
    great novel about memes and the fragile interdependency between data and
    media. (I am a medium for my memes.)

    << Would you say that the world is becoming a ' Digital State ' !? Will we
    one day wake up in a Meme World where the memes are the bodies of
    consciousness !? Have we then entered a new paradigm of evolution or is
    that just an ' idea ' of one ' meme ' letting us believe that !? >>

    Well, that would be a meta-meme describing the state of affairs. I think
    memes are the bodies of our consciousness already. Consider the amnesiac
    who is not "himself" until he can tell you who the president of the United
    States is. Civilization, almost by definition, is based on the relegation
    of genes to provide hosts for memes; a memetic legacy is much more important
    than a genetic one (why else would anyone adopt children?)

    > As to whether memes would survive humanity disappearing, well I think
    there
    > is that possiblity. As I've said before, there are long dead
    civilisations
    > that are studied through their artifacts, especially their writing.
    << that is de facto a new kind of life, memes will surely care for
    themselves !!
    I do not know any meme which is ' loose ' at the time, but I will look for
    it,
    that 's for sure !! >>

    I thought that's what the monoliths in "2001" were for. :-) What is SETI
    but an attempt to find memes in space? So theoretically, all memes are
    loose as long as they retain their media. But if I were a meme, I would
    rather embed myself in the minds of the masses than wait for some ET to read
    me off a stone tablet.

    > I think in principle though, once you have representation systems
    > independent of the human body, then memes can persist.

    I agree, the human body is just a convenient (and evolutionarily
    advantageous) medium. It's also interesting that, in a historical sense,
    the memes that survive often persist through externalized symbols kept close
    to the body -- for example, rings, necklaces, clothing, tools found at
    archaeological sites.

    Asking whether memes persist without sentient beings to host them is a bit
    like asking if a tree that falls in a forest without anyone around makes a
    sound. Yes, it makes a sound, but without that information finding a host,
    nothing useful can come of it.

    << Would we ever be able to communicate with them, in the understanding
    that they are completely independent of the human body. The implications
    of that idea comes close to what I have in mind of what ' Memetical Beings
    '
    could be like.>>

    I communicate with memes all the time. This email, for example. The
    concept of "you" as a genetic entity is irrelevant to the discussion. I am
    merely trying to force my memes to breed with yours. :-) Which is why this
    is such a "stimulating conversation".

    Wes

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jul 09 2000 - 23:48:07 BST