RE: Cons and Facades - more on truth

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Tue Jun 20 2000 - 17:04:22 BST

  • Next message: Richard Brodie: "RE: Cons and Facades - more on truth" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id RAA09593 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 20 Jun 2000 17:07:25 +0100
Subject: RE: Cons and Facades - more on truth
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 12:04:22 -0400
x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu
x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas est veritas
From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
To: "memetics list" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-ID: <20000620160459.AAA22177@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]>
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    On 06/20/00 11:30, Chris Lofting said this-

    >Have a look at ANY modern NLP text

    Well, therein is my problem, you see. Because I also look at places like
    this - http://skepdic.com/neurolin.html and I'm not ready to get past the
    type of bullshit I presently perceive NLP to be.

    So, yeah, I really _do_ want a smoking gun, and so far, anecdotes and
    papers by self-interested (hence my "specious claim of ego-biased
    influence-peddling") practitioners ain't offered me one.

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jun 20 2000 - 17:08:24 BST