Re: Imitation or transmission?

From: Lawrence H. de Bivort (debivort@umd5.umd.edu)
Date: Sun Jun 11 2000 - 14:40:51 BST

  • Next message: Mark M. Mills: "Re: Criticisms of Blackmore's approach"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id OAA02911 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 11 Jun 2000 14:42:46 +0100
    X-Authentication-Warning: marple.umd.edu: debivort owned process doing -bs
    Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 09:40:51 -0400 (EDT)
    From: "Lawrence H. de Bivort" <debivort@umd5.umd.edu>
    X-Sender: debivort@marple.umd.edu
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Imitation or transmission?
    In-Reply-To: <001301bfd394$442291c0$8603bed4@default>
    Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.21.0006110929380.25226-100000@marple.umd.edu>
    Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Sun, 11 Jun 2000, Kenneth Van Oost wrote:

    >merits. Which is why I like this list, fragmentation and all. The area
    >missing from this list,
    >and properly so, IMO, is that of engineering.
    >
    >Lawrence, to which field of engeering are you prefering to !?
    >Technological, biological, mechanical, genetical,...

    "Memetic" engineering. I'm not sure who coined this term, but the idea is
    that it might be possible to design and release a meme with a specified
    goal. I'm not sure this constitutes a 'field' of engineering <grin>.

    Kenneth, you and I have taken the first steps toward a very interesting
    discussion some time in the past: that of self-building via memes. (This
    is a key interest to me, but difficult for me personally to explore, and I
    appreciate your patience.) If this were do-able, or useful, it could, I
    think, be viewed as an element of memetic engineering...

    In an earlier message, I indicated my belief that this listserv is not a
    good place to discuss memetic engineering, but such self-application might
    be appropriate... I have to think a bit about this.

    >(I am, because we are)

    Can you say more about what your sign-off line means? Do you mean this
    metaphysically (would it be equally appropriate to say "We are, because I
    am"?) ?

    Best regards

    - Lawrence

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 11 2000 - 14:43:23 BST