Re: Central questions of memetics

From: Kenneth Van Oost (Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be)
Date: Mon Jun 05 2000 - 20:07:41 BST

  • Next message: Kenneth Van Oost: "Re: Jabbering !"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA29898 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 5 Jun 2000 20:03:30 +0100
    Message-ID: <001001bfcf24$55219620$eb11bed4@default>
    From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D31CEB183@inchna.stir.ac.uk> <391C4C50.4777B958@pacbell.net>
    Subject: Re: Central questions of memetics
    Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2000 21:07:41 +0200
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Bill Spight <bspight@pacbell.net>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Sent: Friday, May 12, 2000 8:24 PM
    Subject: Re: Central questions of memetics

    << Does something having a use in our ancestral environment explain
    its specific form (or forms) of existence in the contemporary environment?
    >>

    Maybe I am what late, and may be I am way off the track here, but
    I came across this.

    Faith did have its use in our ancestral world and its specific form (trust)
    is explained as such in the contemporay environment. No !?

    If we loose our trust can we keep our faith !?

    Kant said, before something works it has to be synthesized into a concept.
    So, before faith works as such it have to possess a bias of/ for trust;
    otherwise nobody would believe anything.

    Faith have its use in our ancestral world as a system of (some kind of)
    truth and its specific form (trust) is explained as such in the contemporay
    environment not as a system of truth but as some kind of justice in which we
    exchange our desires and needs between eachother. (Rorty)
    That is, we entrust our desires and needs to systems which we approach
    as systems (of some) truth, but which are definitely not like that.
    They are just interpretations in which we reflect our desires and needs.
    Those systems are based (we hope) on trust, that is:- such systems hold
    within some truth.
    Without them, we can't exist.

    Regards,

    Kenneth

    (I am, because we are)

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 05 2000 - 20:04:18 BST