Re: Central questions of memetics

From: Chuck Palson (cpalson@mediaone.net)
Date: Fri May 19 2000 - 10:11:46 BST

  • Next message: Chuck Palson: "Re: Central questions of memetics"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id PAA14823 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 19 May 2000 15:09:08 +0100
    Message-ID: <39250552.47458ABD@mediaone.net>
    Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 10:11:46 +0100
    From: Chuck Palson <cpalson@mediaone.net>
    X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (WinNT; I)
    X-Accept-Language: en
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Central questions of memetics
    References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D31CEB1BC@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Vincent Campbell wrote:

    > Chuck, you said:-
    >
    > > Actual history rarely if ever gets preserved. [actual historical events
    > > don't get preserved, sure] They don't get preserved in any meaningful
    > > sense just because they are put on videos or appear once on the news.
    > > They get preserved when people watch them and decide to make it part of
    > > their
    > > "lessons of the past" file. Again, if you are interested in this
    > > particular
    > > process for some reason, fine. But it has no broad effect on the overall
    > > society
    > > -- which is, frankly, what I am interested in because of my evolutionary
    > > interests. That's the only reason why memes caught my attention in the
    > > first
    > > place -- because of the claims that it has something to do with evolution.
    > >
    > So history doesn't get preserved in any meaningful sense by its recording in
    > some form or other? I really can't believe you've said that. I think, just
    > for my addled brain, you need to explain or clarify that.
    >

    I may have overstated my case, but I don't think so. History is modern man's
    mythology. Especially in the US, but also elsewhere, it is a way to rally the
    facts that survive from the past to justify the present. Usually you can find a
    history out there of an event that satisfies just about any common predudice. I
    know that the Europeans are better than the Americans on trying to get over this
    way of looking at history, but it's still pretty much that way. it is a
    narrative form with all the traditional archetypes associated with that form.

    > And cults not having impacts on overall society? Christianity was a cult at
    > its outset.
    >

    Yes, you are right. Very occasionally a cult comes along that explodes. But
    you'de have to be very lucky to pick a cult to study that would do that. I think
    that cults don't tell us as much about human beings as the study of other things
    do because they are too marginal.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 19 2000 - 15:09:37 BST