Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA20490 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 10 May 2000 13:55:50 +0100 Subject: Re: Fwd: Did language drive society or vice versa? Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 08:52:55 -0400 x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas est veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu> To: "memetics list" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20000510125333.AAA19817@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]> Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
On 05/10/00 02:41, Chuck Palson said this-
>I am sure that Wilson at least would definitely not agree with this
>statement,
>nor would a lot of other students of evolution. The gross application of
>statistics that allows people to come up with the "anything is possible" is
>usually just a conceptual stopgap.
Ah, well, I totally agree, in fact, almost the same phrases were gelling
for my reply. The very word 'improbable' is not really part of Wilson's
lexicon. And, no, he is not a statistician, which is where 'improbable'
was invented.
Because, whatever is left, is true....
- Wade
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 10 2000 - 13:56:19 BST