Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id XAA17588 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 9 May 2000 23:48:05 +0100 From: "Richard Brodie" <richard@brodietech.com> To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Subject: RE: Central questions of memetics Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 15:46:16 -0700 Message-ID: <NBBBIIDKHCMGAIPMFFPJIEKLEMAA.richard@brodietech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D31CEB160@inchna.stir.ac.uk> Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Vincent wrote:
<<The problem is Richard that it is far from 'easy' to predict what
audiences
are going to be interested in at anything more than a very general level of
primal interests that you talk about. Rather like saying women pick men
based on high mpi, it is quite a reducitve argument.>>
Have you taken a look at the romance-novel section of a bookstore lately?
I think those primal factors are hugely important. Beyond that, if you want
to create a smash hit that captures the heart of the nation, it's more
difficult. You have to stack some other resonances on top of the basic ones.
But I think it's fairly easy to predict what WON'T be a smash hit...
something difficult to understand, without human interest (characters that
the audience identifies with), void of tension...
Richard Brodie richard@brodietech.com
http://www.memecentral.com/rbrodie.htm
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 09 2000 - 23:48:22 BST