RE: objections to "memes"

From: Richard Brodie (richard@brodietech.com)
Date: Fri Mar 24 2000 - 08:55:15 GMT

  • Next message: Gatherer, D. (Derek): "RE: objections to "memes""

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id IAA10896 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 24 Mar 2000 08:57:21 GMT
    From: "Richard Brodie" <richard@brodietech.com>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: objections to "memes"
    Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 00:55:15 -0800
    Message-ID: <NBBBIIDKHCMGAIPMFFPJIEMMEIAA.richard@brodietech.com>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
    In-reply-to: <A4400389479FD3118C9400508B0FF230040BC9@DELTA.newhouse.akzonobel.nl>
    Importance: Normal
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    No one is talking about explaining memetics at a neurobiological level. If
    you collapse "internal" memetics with operational explanations at the
    neurobiological level you miss entirely what people are excited about. The
    idea is that the contents of people's minds affects their behavior. If you
    refuse to examine the contents of people's minds because you don't have an
    instrument that does it with precision, you miss out on the heart of
    memetics.

    Richard Brodie richard@brodietech.com www.memecentral.com/rbrodie.htm

    -----Original Message-----
    From: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk [mailto:fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk]On Behalf
    Of Gatherer, D. (Derek)
    Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2000 5:36 AM
    To: 'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'
    Subject: RE: objections to "memes"

    Richard:
    So I ask again, how do you explain it? [a learned behavior]

    Derek:
    Oh, I can't explain it at all. If I ever understood how and why people
    learn, I would have stayed in academia.

    But seriously, I don't think it matters that I can't explain learning at the
    neurobiological level. How a behaviour replicates isn't really what
    memetics is about. What memetics is about is the way that learned
    behaviours evolve under selective pressures, how cultures diverge etc. It's
    a population-level rather than an individual-level approach.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 24 2000 - 08:57:35 GMT