Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA08527 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 23 Mar 2000 13:41:16 GMT Message-ID: <A4400389479FD3118C9400508B0FF230040BC9@DELTA.newhouse.akzonobel.nl> From: "Gatherer, D. (Derek)" <D.Gatherer@organon.nhe.akzonobel.nl> To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Subject: RE: objections to "memes" Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 14:35:33 +0100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Richard:
So I ask again, how do you explain it? [a learned behavior]
Derek:
Oh, I can't explain it at all. If I ever understood how and why people
learn, I would have stayed in academia.
But seriously, I don't think it matters that I can't explain learning at the
neurobiological level. How a behaviour replicates isn't really what
memetics is about. What memetics is about is the way that learned
behaviours evolve under selective pressures, how cultures diverge etc. It's
a population-level rather than an individual-level approach.
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 23 2000 - 13:41:30 GMT