RE: objections to "memes"

From: Gatherer, D. (Derek) (D.Gatherer@organon.nhe.akzonobel.nl)
Date: Fri Mar 24 2000 - 09:07:38 GMT

  • Next message: Richard Brodie: "RE: objections to "memes""

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id JAA10960 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 24 Mar 2000 09:10:56 GMT
    Message-ID: <A4400389479FD3118C9400508B0FF230040BD7@DELTA.newhouse.akzonobel.nl>
    From: "Gatherer, D. (Derek)" <D.Gatherer@organon.nhe.akzonobel.nl>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: objections to "memes"
    Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 10:07:38 +0100
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Richard:
    No one is talking about explaining memetics at a neurobiological level.

    Derek:
    Maybe not you or I, but quite a lot of people have pretensions in this
    direction, or at least claim that they will be eventually vindicated by
    neurobiology.

    Richard:
     If
    you collapse "internal" memetics with operational explanations at the
    neurobiological level you miss entirely what people are excited about. The
    idea is that the contents of people's minds affects their behavior.

    Derek:
    Of course, but what's new about that? Isn't that just folk psychology?
    Surely some of the most interesting aspects of human behaviour are those
    where people act against rationality, against their own better judgement,
    and so on.

    Richard:
    If you
    refuse to examine the contents of people's minds because you don't have an
    instrument that does it with precision, you miss out on the heart of
    memetics.

    Derek:
    Surely the 'heart' of any science, the beauty of any science is the way that
    patterns emerge from data, and the more unsuspected the pattern the greater
    the feeling of discovery? And that requires precision of measurement. I
    think we're probably looking for heart in different places.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 24 2000 - 09:11:12 GMT