RE: meaning in memetics

From: Joe E. Dees (joedees@bellsouth.net)
Date: Sun Mar 12 2000 - 12:22:14 GMT

  • Next message: Joe E. Dees: "RE: Monkeys stone herdsman in Kenya"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA05930 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 12 Mar 2000 12:20:27 GMT
    Message-Id: <200003121218.HAA03429@mail2.lig.bellsouth.net>
    From: "Joe E. Dees" <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 06:22:14 -0600
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: RE: meaning in memetics
    In-reply-to: <4.1.20000311123422.009d26c0@mail.rdc1.bc.wave.home.com>
    References: <NBBBIIDKHCMGAIPMFFPJIEOFEHAA.richard@brodietech.com>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12b)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Date sent: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 19:01:18 -0800
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    From: Dan Plante <dplante@home.com>
    Subject: RE: meaning in memetics
    Send reply to: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    > Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organization of Brain and Behaviour - J. A. Scott
    > Kelso
    >
    > Creating Mind: How the Brain Works - John E. Dowling
    >
    > I should say up front that these are difficult to get through (especially
    > "Dynamic Patterns") even if you have a mathematical background (which I don't)
    > or a technical background (which I do). The thing is, I figure you have to slug
    > through this stuff if you want to successfully build a new theory, rather than
    > cobble together a straw house with a short half-life built on other people's
    > unsubstantiated opinions (which is what this email is, for instance).
    >
    > After reading these books back-to-back, it's interesting to note how the
    > general ideas in each book complement each other, even though Dowling deals
    > with biochemical and structural specifics, while Kelso deals with synergistic
    > and systemic generalities in a mathematical way. It is also useful to note
    > where these works reside in terms of the heirarchy of emergent systems from
    > neurobiology to culture: right near the bottom. If anyone is aware of a
    > similarly complimentary duo of books, just as grounded in peer-reviewed
    > research, but near the other end of the scale (maybe in the fields of
    > cognitive-neurophysiology/linguistics/semiotics, etc) I'd be grateful.
    >
    Try PRINCIPLES OF INTERPRETATION by Edward G. Ballard and
    INTERPRETATION THEORY by Paul Ricoeur for the hermeneutic
    view, and THE HUMAN USE OF SIGNS: ELEMENTS OF
    ANTHROPOSEMIOSIS by John Deely and ON MEANING:
    SELECTED WRITINGS IN SEMIOTIC THEORY by A. J. Greimas
    for the semiotic perspective.
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 12 2000 - 12:20:38 GMT