RE: Monkeys stone herdsman in Kenya

From: Robin Faichney (robin@faichney.demon.co.uk)
Date: Sun Mar 12 2000 - 11:40:19 GMT

  • Next message: Joe E. Dees: "RE: meaning in memetics"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA05885 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 12 Mar 2000 12:04:09 GMT
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@faichney.demon.co.uk>
    Organization: Reborn Technology
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: RE: Monkeys stone herdsman in Kenya
    Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 11:40:19 +0000
    X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.21]
    Content-Type: text/plain
    References: <NBBBIIDKHCMGAIPMFFPJIEOKEHAA.richard@brodietech.com>
    Message-Id: <00031211520200.00474@faichney>
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    It's Sunday again, and I find a precious few minutes to participate in my
    favourite mailing list.

    On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, Richard Brodie wrote:
    >
    >I would call information in a book an artifact.

    The book itself is obviously an artifact, but the information "in" it? That
    begs many questions, not least of which is: what exactly do we mean when we say
    that there is information "in" a book? I think that such questions have to be
    answered before memetics can make very much progress. In fact, I think that
    the lack of such answers is precisely what has bogged memetics down since 1976,
    and will continue to do so until they are provided. And I confidently predict
    that the central concept here will be found to be that of encoding.

    >It may be that a percentage
    >of humans with a certain cultural context

    Or decoding key?

    >predictably acquire a certain meme
    >from observing a single artifact (such as your example), or it may be that
    >it requires (e.g.) an entire course of study at a university before someone
    >predictably acquires a certain meme.

    More key(s), no?

    >Either way, as long as the
    >self-perpetuating structure of acquired mental information is there, it's
    >properly studied as memetics.

    Agreed -- with the quibble that "mental" is not very well defined, but if it's
    taken to mean "in the brain", then memes only spend part of their life-cycle
    there -- admittedly an absolutely essential part. Gosh, it gives you
    confidence when you know Dennett shares your position! :-)

    --
    Robin Faichney
    

    ===============================This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 12 2000 - 12:04:19 GMT