Re: new line: what's the point?

From: Joe E. Dees (joedees@bellsouth.net)
Date: Fri Mar 03 2000 - 02:00:31 GMT

  • Next message: Raymond Recchia: "Re: Monkeys stone herdsman in Kenya"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id BAA05978 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 3 Mar 2000 01:58:34 GMT
    Message-Id: <200003030156.UAA25752@mail5.lig.bellsouth.net>
    From: "Joe E. Dees" <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 20:00:31 -0600
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: new line: what's the point?
    In-reply-to: <00030216132702.03748@faichney>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12b)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    From: Robin Faichney <robin@faichney.demon.co.uk>
    Organization: Reborn Technology
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: new line: what's the point?
    Date sent: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 16:11:26 +0000
    Send reply to: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    > On Wed, 01 Mar 2000, Joe E. Dees wrote:
    > >Date sent: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 08:48:51 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time)
    > >From: TJ Olney <market@cc.wwu.edu>
    > >To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > >Subject: Re: new line: what's the point?
    > >Send reply to: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > >
    > >> The point of memetics as I see it is a unifying bridge for all these
    > >> disciplines. As such, it will function much like genetics as a
    > >> referential basis for other disciplines.
    > >>
    > >> Memetics provides the best explanations to date for the selective
    > >> transmission of cultural information, whether that information takes the form
    > >> of meanings, of kinship relationships, of technologies, or of natural laws.
    > >>
    > >There IS NO information in the absence of meaning
    >
    > You said that before, and I replied "Try telling that to a physicist", to which
    > I did not see any response. I'm still interested.
    >
    And a physicist, Bob Logan, has responded to you. Try reading
    Shannon and Weaver also, and Fred Dretske and Norbert Weiner
    and John Von Neumann (I know it's useless asking you to read
    ANYthing, but I thought I'd try - again! - anyway).
    > --
    > Robin Faichney
    >
    >
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 03 2000 - 01:58:38 GMT