Re: new line: what's the point?

From: Robin Faichney (robin@faichney.demon.co.uk)
Date: Sat Mar 04 2000 - 16:20:10 GMT

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: new line: what's the point?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA10280 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 4 Mar 2000 18:44:18 GMT
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@faichney.demon.co.uk>
    Organization: Reborn Technology
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: new line: what's the point?
    Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2000 16:20:10 +0000
    X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.21]
    Content-Type: text/plain
    References: <200003030156.UAA25752@mail5.lig.bellsouth.net>
    Message-Id: <00030416310600.00924@faichney>
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Fri, 03 Mar 2000, Joe E. Dees wrote:
    >> On Wed, 01 Mar 2000, Joe E. Dees wrote:
    >> >>
    >> >There IS NO information in the absence of meaning
    >>
    >> You said that before, and I replied "Try telling that to a physicist", to which
    >> I did not see any response. I'm still interested.
    >>
    >And a physicist, Bob Logan, has responded to you.

    Unfortunately, the only directly relevant sentence in his message was "I'm a
    physicist and I agree with both statements." Not very helpful. In any case, I
    wanted your response, not someone else's.

    >Try reading
    >Shannon and Weaver also, and Fred Dretske and Norbert Weiner
    >and John Von Neumann (I know it's useless asking you to read
    >ANYthing, but I thought I'd try - again! - anyway).

    Never mind the reading lists. Discuss the issue, if you can. I recently
    posted a question on this to sci.physics, and was generally pleased with the
    response. I suggest you use deja.com to check it out -- the subject line is
    "Information in physics". And if you still say "there is no information in the
    absence of meaning" after doing that, perhaps you could drop a line to the list
    (and the newsgroup?) on the topic "Why the concept of information in the
    context of thermodynamics is invalid".

    --
    Robin Faichney
    

    ===============================This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 04 2000 - 18:44:52 GMT