other hydrology papers
hydrology + modelisation | hydrosocial issues in the firma project | comparison of river basin managment | integrated river basin managment | property institutions and water rights |

comparison of river basin management in europe : Erik Mostert (link to printable version)


contents | river basin institutions | river basin planning | three models | operational management | results of river basin management

Whenever thinking about water, it is helpful to have a conceptual model:

river basin Institutions

  • France: Agence de l'Eau/ Commissions locales de l'Eau: The Agence de l'Eau have financial instruments and the ability to make plans for water management, such as metering schemes, but not the power to implement them. The Commisions make detailed plans for small local areas.
  • Germany: Coordination platforms: these are responsible for water management allocation. River Basin institutions (NRW), water management associations
  • Netherlands: Regional waterboards. There are institutions only at regional level, decentralised state, national, provincial and local control.
  • Portugal: River councils. There are six separate institutions - river basin councils with representatives from local organisations and NGO's.
  • UK: Environment Agency; and regional institutions at a local level.

map 1: territories of the Agencies de L'Eau (thick lines), and SAGES in preparation

 

river basin planning

  • France: SDAGE/ SAGE
  • Germany: Primarily in NRW. There is little planning, as it is considered to be quickly out of date and ineffective. There are exceptions, but it is generally not popular.
  • Netherlands: No, but much planning. There is a planning system for land use, water management, environmental management at all three government levels, strategic, operational and planning, but it is not specifically based on river basins, which may be problematic. Public consultation is considered important.
  • Portugal: River basin planning exists in15 regions
  • UK: CMP/ LEAP. Catchment management plans have now been replaced by EA plans which are broader in scope. Public consultation is considered important.

the rhine (basin)

  • 1950 (1963): ICPR Monitoring and research
  • 1970: Rhine dead
  • 1976: Chemicals and Chlorides conventions
  • 1986: Sandoz
  • 1987 Rhine Action Plan
  • 1995: floods
  • 1998 Flood Action Plan
  • 2000: New Rhine Treaty

three models

 

Hydrological model

  • river basin authorities
  • river basin planning

Administrative model

  • river basin absent in organizational structure
  • no river basin planning

Coordinated model

  • coordination platforms
  • river basin planning

three models

 

Hydrological model

  • river basin authorities
  • river basin planning

Administrative model

  • river basin absent in organizational structure
  • no river basin planning

Coordinated model

  • coordination platforms
  • river basin planning

river basin management characterised

organizational structure based on hydrological boundaries?

  totally       coordinated  
not at all
yes
hydrological model
 
UK
Pt
river basin planning?
Fr
 
coordinated model
 
Nl
 
Ge
no
administrative model

 

operational management: most popular instruments

  Regulatory Economic/ financial Communi-cative Operational
France        
Germany        
Netherlands        
Portugal        
England & Wales        
Rhine        
Scheldt and Meuse        
Iberian basins        

decision support

  • Everywhere
  • Special role in Netherlands and Rhine
  • Traditional DS
 
Sewage
Other point sources Diffuse sources Water quality Water scarcity Flooding and river maintenance Overall degradation? Water management - land-use planning Conflicts within areas Between areas/ countries
France A,2 A, 2-3 A-X, 1-2 A,2 A-X, 1-2 A-X,1-2 No A, 1-2 A, 2 B, 2
Germany A,2-3 A,3 A,1-2 B,2 X A, 2 No A, 2 A, 2 B, 3
Netherlands A,2 A,3 A,1-2 A,3 B,1 A, 2 No A, 1-2 A, 2 B, 3
Portugal A,2-1 A,1-2 A,1 A,1-2 X(A?) A, 1-2 No A, 1-2 A, 2 A, 2
England & Wales A,3 A,3 A,2 A,2 B,3 A, 3 No A, 1-2 B, 2 A, 3
Rhine A,3 A,2-3 A,2 A-B,2-3 X A, 2 No A, 2 A, 2 A, 2
Scheldt and Meuse A,2 A,2 A,2 A,2-3 X A, 1-2 No A, 2 A, 1-2 A, 1-2
Iberian basins A,2 A,2 A,2 B,2 A,2 n.d. No n.d. X A, 1-2

 

results of river basin management

  • Number of problems solved or being solved, others not yet
  • No overall degradation, but
  • Flooding problem everywhere
  • Water - land use!
  • Water - agriculture!
conclusions
  • Much variety in management systems
  • Many managers
  • The water sector does not suffice anymore
    • land-use
    • agriculture
  • Communicative instruments and PP become more popular
  • Framework Directive water!

 

conclusions: international basins

Development of co-operation takes much time Issue linkage. Be prepared for disasters (2x)! Non-binding action plans can be very effective Commissions too

link to Erik's other presentation: Integrated River Basin Management, Results of the water 21 project Paper for Hydrotop, Marseille 17 June 1999

 


This website is the sole responsiblity of the Firma Project and does not represent the opinion of the European Community nor is the European community responsible for any use that might be made of the data appearing herein.