Next message: Dace: "Re: Words and Memes"
- Previous message: Dace: "Re: Words and Memes"
- In reply to: Wade T.Smith: "speaking of science fiction"
- Reply: Richard Brodie: "RE: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Reply: AaronLynch@aol.com: "Re: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Reply: Philip Jonkers: "Re: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Reply: Kenneth Van Oost: "Fw: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Reply: AaronLynch@aol.com: "Re: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Reply: AaronLynch@aol.com: "Re: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Reply: Vincent Campbell: "RE: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Reply: Grant Callaghan: "RE: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Reply: Grant Callaghan: "RE: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Reply: Scott Chase: "RE: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Reply: Scott Chase: "RE: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Reply: Grant Callaghan: "RE: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Reply: AaronLynch@aol.com: "Re: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Reply: Scott Chase: "RE: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Reply: AaronLynch@aol.com: "Re: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Reply: Steve Drew: "Re: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Reply: AaronLynch@aol.com: "Re: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Reply: Vincent Campbell: "RE: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Reply: dgatherer@talk21.com: "RE: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Messages sorted by: 
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA24915 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 15 Feb 2002 18:46:41 GMT
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020215133938.02c98c30@pop.cogeco.ca>
X-Sender: hkhenson@pop.cogeco.ca
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 13:43:35 -0500
To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
From: Keith Henson <hkhenson@cogeco.ca>
Subject: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults
In-Reply-To: <20020215051423.9545C1FD46@camail.harvard.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
---An Evolutionary Psychology Perspective On Why and How Cult Memes Get A 
Drug-Like Hold On People--and what might be done about it.
H. Keith Henson
Abstract:
In the aggregate, memes constitute human culture.  A whole class of memes 
(cults, religions) have no obvious replication drivers.  Why are some 
humans highly susceptible?  To answer this question I digress into 
evolutionary psychology.  There are two major evolved psychological 
mechanisms emerging from the past to make us susceptible to 
cults.  Capture-bonding exemplified by Patty Hearst and the Stockholm 
Syndrome is one.  Attention reward is the other.  Attention is the way 
social primates measure status.  Increasing status is highly 
rewarding--causes the release of chemicals (dopamine and 
endorphins).  Actions leads to Attention that releases Rewarding brain 
chemicals.  Drugs shortcut Action-Attention-Reward (AAR) brain system and 
lead to the repeated behavior we refer to as addiction.  Gambling and 
addictive drugs cause misfiring of the AAR pathway.  Memes that manifest as 
cults hijack this brain reward system by modifying behavior between cult 
members to high levels of attention.  People may become irresponsible on 
either cults or drugs resulting in severe damage to reproductive potential.
Evolutionary psychology answers the question of why human are susceptible 
to memes that do them and/or their potential for reproductive success 
damage.  Psychological traits of capture-bonding and attention rewards that 
make us vulnerable evolved for other functions.  Cults and drugs both take 
advantage of the same vital motivational reward pathway.  Cults sometimes 
use capture-bonding.  Proposals for modeling are presented.
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
- Next message: Dace: "Re: Words and Memes"
- Previous message: Dace: "Re: Words and Memes"
- In reply to: Wade T.Smith: "speaking of science fiction"
- Reply: Richard Brodie: "RE: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Reply: AaronLynch@aol.com: "Re: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Reply: Philip Jonkers: "Re: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Reply: Kenneth Van Oost: "Fw: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Reply: AaronLynch@aol.com: "Re: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Reply: AaronLynch@aol.com: "Re: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Reply: Vincent Campbell: "RE: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Reply: Grant Callaghan: "RE: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Reply: Grant Callaghan: "RE: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Reply: Scott Chase: "RE: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Reply: Scott Chase: "RE: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Reply: Grant Callaghan: "RE: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Reply: AaronLynch@aol.com: "Re: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Reply: Scott Chase: "RE: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Reply: AaronLynch@aol.com: "Re: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Reply: Steve Drew: "Re: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Reply: AaronLynch@aol.com: "Re: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Reply: Vincent Campbell: "RE: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Reply: dgatherer@talk21.com: "RE: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"
- Messages sorted by: 
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 
: Fri Feb 15 2002 - 18:56:22 GMT