RE: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Mon Feb 18 2002 - 13:23:17 GMT

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: religious viruses"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA05113 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 18 Feb 2002 13:31:06 GMT
    Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3102A6D260@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults
    Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 13:23:17 -0000
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    X-Filter-Info: UoS MailScan 0.1 [D 1]
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

            <There was a time when children *were* wealth. You could use their
    labor to have more children yourself and to make the tribe resistant to
    being attacked.

    > Times have changed.>
    >
            They have but not that dramatically. A few months back on the list,
    I believe we touched on research suggesting that the social investment in
    ensuring a child reached an acceptable level of social standing was behind
    the small number of children had by the most highly developed nations. The
    same principle is at work- the average middle class parents can't afford to
    send 6 kids to law school, so better just have one or 2, but if they get to
    law school, they'll be able to to look after the parents in old age, and
    provide for any children they may have at the same standard of living. In a
    subsistence existence, as millions of people still find themselves in all
    around the world, more kids makes sense due to low survival rates etc. etc.

            Vincent

    -- 
    The University of Stirling is a university established in Scotland by
    charter at Stirling, FK9 4LA.  Privileged/Confidential Information may
    be contained in this message.  If you are not the addressee indicated
    in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such
    person), you may not disclose, copy or deliver this message to anyone
    and any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
    prohibited and may be unlawful.  In such case, you should destroy this
    message and kindly notify the sender by reply email.  Please advise
    immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email
    for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and other
    information in this message that do not relate to the official
    business of the University of Stirling shall be understood as neither
    given nor endorsed by it.
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 18 2002 - 13:47:06 GMT